A horse with Hooters, now that’s classy. It caught me off guard this morning when I read stories about Hooters joining on as a new co-sponsor for this year’s Kentucky Derby and Preakness winner Big Brown, just in time for a likely triple crowning of the thoroughbred. I mean, this is a horse named after UPS, you know brown trucks, brown uniforms. According to an Associated Press article, “the horse was named in honor of UPS, a client of original owner Paul Pompa Jr’s trucking business.”

Well the big brown company, UPS should be turning a shade of red after they let one of the best marketing and PR opportunities for any company slip through their hands and into the bosom of Hooters. That’s right, they should have been exclusive sponsors of the horse, especially after winning the Kentucky Derby UPS should have locked up exclusive sponsorship to the thoroughbred. Big Brown is being compared to some of the best horses to have won those prestigious races. And what do winning horses have? Speed. And what do I like best about my shipping company? Speed hmmm, nice brand association ain’t it?

Was it not enough ROI to spend a comparative pittance for the Kentucky Derby sponsorship to get $1.5 million in advertising exposure? Was it not enough to be associated with a winner whose name is practically the subtitle of your company? (What can Brown do for you?)

This was a big customer with a horse running, and winning so far, in the three most important, nationally covered horse races in the country. What’s not to sponsor?!

Now, because of short-sightedness combined with a lack decisive management and then some, UPS marketers have looked a gift horse in the mouth. They will be sharing the sponsorship spotlight with Hooters, yup the place that makes you think of wings and breasts, not in that order, a co-sponsor of Big Brown for the third and final leg of the Triple Crown, the Belmont Stakes.

Tell me, if there is a joint photo op, UPS delivery person in uniform on the left and Hooters spokeswoman in uniform on the right, – Get the picture brand managers?

OK enough UPS bashing let’s get after this ridiculous comment from Kelly Wietsma, president of Equisponse, the marketing agency that represents Big Brown’s owner IEAH Stables. Wiestsma has been quoted in BrandWeek, and other articles, on Big Brown’s marketing future, “We’re definitely going to mass market in a way that’s never been done in our industry. I want every kid in America to be able to walk into a Wal-Mart and buy a Big Brown shirt or a Big Brown Beanie Babie.”

One of us is out of touch with the American parent. I have three daughters ages, 10, 11 and 16. I grew up around horse racing and saw Secretariat win the Belmont Stakes. I am a big fan of the horse Big Brown. However, given the stupidity of this misalignment of brand sponsorship, I don’t believe Wiestsma will see Beanie Babies, perhaps in Hooters shirts, flying off Wal-Mart shelves.

This decision is a lack of being decisive at UPS and a ton of greed by Equisponse with little regard to what a brand really means.
Good luck Big Brown you’re a hell of a horse. To those entrusted with brand management on this one, see picture ——–>

Update to this blog on June 7 at 9:25pm CDT.

I read with great interest that the New York Racing Association (NYRA), who runs the Belmont Stakes and Belmont Park, rejected Hooters secondary sponsorship of Big Brown. The horse’s jockey Kent Desormeaux was threatened with a fine if a Hooters logo showed up on his silks.

NYRA attributed their decision to a conflict with an unnamed sponsor. Curious isn’t it? My guess is either UPS forked over more cash, or an even more complex plot, they got another entity to be a silent sponsor, to pay more money with the caveat that Hooters’ honeys can’t be part of the party.

Was this a distraction that could have been avoided? You bet.