<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Target PR misses the mark</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/</link>
	<description>The Marketing Edge, one of the longest running marketing and public relations podcasts.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 13:28:37 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Social Realist &#187; Blog Buzz on PR: January 18, 2008</title>
		<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-177764</link>
		<dc:creator>Social Realist &#187; Blog Buzz on PR: January 18, 2008</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Oct 2010 16:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/#comment-177764</guid>
		<description>[...] Target PR Misses the Mark &#8211; Marketing Edge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Target PR Misses the Mark &#8211; Marketing Edge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Target puts non-traditional media out of sight: missed opportunity or bullet dodged? &#171; Diabloguer</title>
		<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-50635</link>
		<dc:creator>Target puts non-traditional media out of sight: missed opportunity or bullet dodged? &#171; Diabloguer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 15:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/#comment-50635</guid>
		<description>[...] Marketing Edge discusses very effectively the many ways this response was bad PR; there’s no need for me to try to further polish this particular apple. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing Edge discusses very effectively the many ways this response was bad PR; there’s no need for me to try to further polish this particular apple. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Valeria Maltoni</title>
		<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-49630</link>
		<dc:creator>Valeria Maltoni</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 00:25:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/#comment-49630</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s the organization&#039;s culture? Does taking initiative get kudos or is it severely curtailed? Do lawyers rule? Peeling the onion that way may give us a glimpse at why the official PR response was so wooden. People really do want to talk and connect, they do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s the organization&#8217;s culture? Does taking initiative get kudos or is it severely curtailed? Do lawyers rule? Peeling the onion that way may give us a glimpse at why the official PR response was so wooden. People really do want to talk and connect, they do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sally Hodge</title>
		<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-49423</link>
		<dc:creator>Sally Hodge</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 18:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/#comment-49423</guid>
		<description>Oh, ouch!  Here&#039;s a brand that&#039;s getting kudos right and left for defining &quot;masstige,&quot; getting the customer experience right, and edgy marketing -- yet its PR department lives up to all the negative stereotypes. Target&#039;s PR folks apparently are like too many practitioners -- they&#039;re order takers who aren&#039;t driving any strategic conversations on how new/social media needs to be factored into their outreach.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, ouch!  Here&#8217;s a brand that&#8217;s getting kudos right and left for defining &#8220;masstige,&#8221; getting the customer experience right, and edgy marketing &#8212; yet its PR department lives up to all the negative stereotypes. Target&#8217;s PR folks apparently are like too many practitioners &#8212; they&#8217;re order takers who aren&#8217;t driving any strategic conversations on how new/social media needs to be factored into their outreach.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Benidt</title>
		<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-49389</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Benidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 13:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/#comment-49389</guid>
		<description>Easy answer here. Target should hire Albert. As my media training brother Bruce would say, &quot;you can hire me now and we&#039;ll avoid things like this - or you can hire me later to fight the fire.&quot; If Albert Maruggi was leading Target&#039;s PR - do you think they&#039;d think bloggers and podcasters are irrelevant? 

There are so many issues here - and so little time in a comment. Maryn McKenna wrote a post on the Poynter Institute&#039;s blog that suggested Target will reconsider it&#039;s approach to bloggers. Ya&#039; think?!! - 
http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=136013

We write a &quot;young, self-important blog&quot; and try not to throw tantrums. We do ask for interviews regularly from companies large and small. They have no reason whatsoever to spend time with us - from the standpoint of our reach or credentials. The amazing thing is that the majority of them say yes - even to &quot;in-person&quot; interviews. In just the past few months tons of companies and organizations like ZoomInfo.com, ReadyTalk.com, Creative Commons - and, yup, Albert Maruggi at Provident Partners, have taken their important company time for phone or in-person interviews with us. That actually is an amazing thing when you consider how new blogging is. We find very few Targets. Heck, maybe we&#039;ll ask them for an interview.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Easy answer here. Target should hire Albert. As my media training brother Bruce would say, &#8220;you can hire me now and we&#8217;ll avoid things like this &#8211; or you can hire me later to fight the fire.&#8221; If Albert Maruggi was leading Target&#8217;s PR &#8211; do you think they&#8217;d think bloggers and podcasters are irrelevant? </p>
<p>There are so many issues here &#8211; and so little time in a comment. Maryn McKenna wrote a post on the Poynter Institute&#8217;s blog that suggested Target will reconsider it&#8217;s approach to bloggers. Ya&#8217; think?!! &#8211;<br />
<a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=136013" rel="nofollow">http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=136013</a></p>
<p>We write a &#8220;young, self-important blog&#8221; and try not to throw tantrums. We do ask for interviews regularly from companies large and small. They have no reason whatsoever to spend time with us &#8211; from the standpoint of our reach or credentials. The amazing thing is that the majority of them say yes &#8211; even to &#8220;in-person&#8221; interviews. In just the past few months tons of companies and organizations like ZoomInfo.com, ReadyTalk.com, Creative Commons &#8211; and, yup, Albert Maruggi at Provident Partners, have taken their important company time for phone or in-person interviews with us. That actually is an amazing thing when you consider how new blogging is. We find very few Targets. Heck, maybe we&#8217;ll ask them for an interview.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joanne Henry</title>
		<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-49273</link>
		<dc:creator>Joanne Henry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 21:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/#comment-49273</guid>
		<description>Albert&#039;s right.  This blogger is a mom with 2 girls,  business owner, weekly Target consumer and sometime Target business buyer. I now think Target must totally misunderstand their &#039;target&#039; audience and that&#039;s a surprise. At least their communications department doesn&#039;t get it. Also surprising. 

I  remember writing a complaint letter to a Mpls  bank holding company - now Wells Fargo -- when it decided to rebrand and take down every WeatherBall on top local banks. They could have easily dismissed me as Target did the blog complaint. Instead, I got a letter with a personal explanation about the reasons and a cheerful -&#039;hope you&#039;ll stick with us anyway&#039; signed by the president of the bank holding company.  Yes, I knew it was probably PR - but it was great PR and they kept me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Albert&#8217;s right.  This blogger is a mom with 2 girls,  business owner, weekly Target consumer and sometime Target business buyer. I now think Target must totally misunderstand their &#8216;target&#8217; audience and that&#8217;s a surprise. At least their communications department doesn&#8217;t get it. Also surprising. </p>
<p>I  remember writing a complaint letter to a Mpls  bank holding company &#8211; now Wells Fargo &#8212; when it decided to rebrand and take down every WeatherBall on top local banks. They could have easily dismissed me as Target did the blog complaint. Instead, I got a letter with a personal explanation about the reasons and a cheerful -&#8217;hope you&#8217;ll stick with us anyway&#8217; signed by the president of the bank holding company.  Yes, I knew it was probably PR &#8211; but it was great PR and they kept me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Buzz on PR: January 18, 2008 : Naked PR</title>
		<link>http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/comment-page-1/#comment-49240</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Buzz on PR: January 18, 2008 : Naked PR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jan 2008 16:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.providentpartners.net/blog/index.php/2008/01/18/target-pr-misses-the-mark/#comment-49240</guid>
		<description>[...] Target PR Misses the Mark - Marketing Edge [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Target PR Misses the Mark &#8211; Marketing Edge [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

